Since May 11th, New Zealand
passed from Level 3 to Level 2 alert and life starts to re-gain its old rhythm.
The fact that this country has only 1,503 COVID-19 cases and 21 dead was a
collective effort during the lockdown since March 23rd (when there
were approx. 100 cases). Statistics reports that the citizens of New Zealand
followed the advice of the authorities and stayed home: the number of visitors
to parks and beaches dropped by 75 percent, the number of those using the buses
and trains dropped by 82 percent and the visits to shops dropped by 88 percent.
Furthermore, Jacinda Ardern and her Cabinet decided on a concrete form of their
solidarity with the people living in New Zealand: a 20 percent pay cut for the following six months. It is a concrete top-down and bottom-up
collective effort for the best preservation of the individuals and of the
society as a whole. As a politician, Jacinda Ardern reached record-high
approvals from her fellow citizens and voters for the way her Labour Government
handled this coronavirus crisis, meaning she has the trust and the honor of the
citizens to hold the power to take decisions for their common good.
I will explore hereafter the
reasons why I got nearly shocked (in a positive sense) when reading this
article: I generally hardly agree with poorly argumentative comments, or with
those comments whose arguments are illogical to me, or those with arguments
that bypass morality and decency, and I am myself – like everyone else – strongly
oppinated. However, I never push further, on the contrary I step back, when I
sense a clash of mentalities, because neither them nor me are going to get
anywhere arguing. And all of a sudden, I read an article in ‘The Guardian’
about the New Zealand’s Prime-Minister and I agree with all of the characters
in this ‘Café Story’!
First,
I agree with the author of this article, who writes that ‘while leaders of other
countries may send staff ahead to make arrangements…’ – absolutely correct –
Jacinda Ardern is the exception. And I agree twice with the author when it
writes that ‘rarer still for them [head of states] to be turned away’ – absolutely
correct. Anybody else somewhere else on this planet would have probably freaked
out and who knows? Maybe it would have invited a regular citizen to leave and
make room to the politician, elected and paid by the citizens. That would be a
non-sense.
Therefore,
second, I agree with the manager. They were all booked. He definitely had
available tables, probably in a storage room, but bringing any would mean to
break the law – that is applicable equally to everybody. He decided to respect
the law on social distancing and to look at Jacinda Ardern as to a regular
citizen.
I
agree with Jacinda Ardern, too! Why do I agree? I agree with her answer: ‘I’ll
wait, just like everyone else!’ What??? ‘Just like everyone else!’ How’s that?!
Does she have any pride to allow herself the arrogance to be treated in a
‘privileged’ way? Apparently, no. And who knows? Maybe she would feel offended
if treated privileged. This mentality translated in such a behavior reminded me
of the Queen and the King of Sweden who traveled this year as far as to India.
Forth,
the manager is also an interesting character in this café story! Besides the
fact that he respected the law without any exceptions or giving any privileges,
once a table was free, he did not wait for customers to knock at his café’s
door – which were closed in the previous two months because of the lockdown –
but he himself ran after customers and he catched Jacinda and Clarke down the
street to tell them that a table was available. How’s that?! Does he have any
pride to allow himself the arrogance and the manager’s privilege to send somebody
else to run after Jacinda and Clarke? Apparently, no.
Fifth,
I agree and I disagree with Clarke Grayford. I disagree when he took the whole
blame on him for not having made reservations, because this almost-unreal story
happened on a Saturday morning after a two-month lockdown and it could have
been a spontaneous decision, but I agree that it’s polite of him to have said
that. Where I fully agree with Clarke Grayford is precisely when referring to the
moment when they were chased down the street by the manager to be told that a
table was free. He summarized the best way possible tweeting ‘A+ service’.
To sum up, I chose to comment on
this article because it is particular as writing style to write a blog article
commenting on something one agrees with rather than on something one disagrees, looks for arguments and organizes them on paper. Furthermore it was
also lovely to comment agreeing rather than disagreeing, and also more
comfortable – in general, things are more comfortable, to me at least, when ‘two
minds think alike’.
I loved to discover
that New Zealand has the same attitude like the Scandinavian one that I have been long admiring. I love to be optimistic and to hope that there are plenty of
other similar examples in the world. Anyway, this New Zeeland café story with
the Prime Minister, her partner, and the café manager was an ‘A+ story’ with
‘A+ characters’, of an ‘A+ mentality’. Chapeau! Hat up! (the end)
No comments:
Post a Comment