Wednesday 25 September 2019

Reflecting Upon the American and the European Citizenship (I)


photo by Laura Lai
by Laura Lai/Comment

Last week was the Constitutional Week in the United States. A whole week to celebrate the American Constitution! And how to celebrate it better than granting citizenship to new Americans and organize naturalizations ceremonies at the White House and across the country?!
            In my opinion, the history of the formation of the United States of America is the most beautiful political story of the modern times. In the context of the whole history of humankind, I find the story of the formation of the United States from its independence fight to the building of its institutions and the challenges of multiculturalism to a world superpower, as the most fascinating story to read after the story of the Old Testament.
            During this Constitutional Week, on the 17th of September 2019, the Americans celebrated the Constitutional Day and the Citizenship Day. This was an opportunity and an invitation to reflect upon the meaning and importance of citizenship.
It was at the end of July 2019, when the U.S. President Donald Trump went to Virginia to celebrate 400 years since the first (continuing) legislative assembly of an elected 22-representative on the 31st of July 1619 in Jamestown (to see the video, click here). It was the time when the U.S. was still a colony and from this self-governing initiative unfolds a fascinating 400-year democracy and state building. Nowadays, when a reform of the immigration policy looks more imperative than ever, Donald Trump said about the granting of U.S. citizenship that:

‘We don’t give them [immigrants] a permit, we give them a history, a heritage, a name, a future of limitless possibilities and potential.’

I can’t agree more with this point of view. In practice, the granting of citizenship by the host country is an honor that the society – who was there before, paid taxes and raised the country – grants the new comers. I cannot agree more that this is an acknowledgement on behalf of the society which forms the state of all struggles and all efforts of the new comer: to learn the language, to respect the laws, etc. And by applying and accepting the new citizenship is not like applying and accepting a permit, but the new comer takes an oath of loyalty to its choice country, whatever the reason might have been for that choice. The former general attorney of Virginia and the current director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services declared that:

‘We believe that US Citizenship is the greatest honor and privilege in the world. The Constitution ‘secures the blessings of liberties’ so that we can live in freedom, both individually and as a nation, by protecting our rights and providing for a common defense.’

In theory the concept of citizenship is a complex concept. And relating it to liberties, freedoms and common duties, means focusing on what the concept of citizenship means, its boundaries and also its fundamentals.
            Although complex, when citizenship is defined in terms of rights given by the state to its citizens, in order to freely gather, freely speak, etc. and duties from the citizens to respect the character of the state (usually secular) and its laws, citizenship as such is grounded on liberal values. Furthermore, it is always a state that grants citizenship. Therefore, the state’s boundaries are the limits within which the citizenship is exercised and it is in relation to the state that the citizenship is legally defined. The recent global action of school children and youngsters from all over the world to ‘go on strike’ in order to call on the political leaders to do more on global change, is more like an action of world’s citizens on a precise topic. It can be some sort of attitude-related citizenship that is difficult to be defined. Anyway, the fundamentals of citizenship were and still are: loyalty, patriotism, different forms of civic participation (voluntary work, etc.). From the point of view of the fundaments of citizenship, I also agree with Aristotle who said that ‘a good person is not necessarily a good citizen’. And I think that a good citizen is not necessarily always a good person (ex. citizens in jail for different felonies committed against members of the society). (to be continued)

No comments:

Post a Comment