by Laura Lai/Comment
Writing
is… a writer is… and there are so many definitions as heads are. I agree with
the one saying that writing is a ‘temperamental inclination’. A writer will
always look for some moments alone and for a quiet and/or inspiring place (or
corner of a place), in order to detach itself from its observations of people
and life, and write about it. Some write to create another world – a fantasy
world, usually better or perfect. Others write to describe the real world as
reflected in an artistic mirror. Others to make a point. To communicate. And so
on.
But this coronavirus times – that
many of us witnessed more in artistic movies than in reality – is pushing
everybody to keep social distancing, without allowing visits or gatherings. The
society responds to the rules imposed by this invisible killing enemy with
advices to isolate and keep your routine. What routine to keep for those used
to spent time outdoors?! These people live the excitement of discovering a new
life! And some may realize now what it means to be a writer. ‘Boring! Outdoors
is more beautiful’ – would many of them say. That’s because they only enter the
‘boring environment’ of a writer without writing, but doing other interesting
activities. In this ‘boring environment’ the writer detaches itself from the
‘beautiful outdoors’ to create something fascinating. Therefore, a virtual
museum tour instead of a proper museum visit is not a big routine change for a
writer – it is still indoors. And it stays fascinating.
I have heard that Google Arts & Culture made a list of
world museums that I can virtually visit. I wanted to make a great use of these
ugly coronovirus times and make the tour of the National Museum of Anthropology
(Mexico City) and that of the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art
(South Korea), because I visited lots of museums in Europe, but for these ones
I am not sure that I will have the resources to visit too soon, if ever. I
ended up visiting the Holocaust Museum & Learning Center from St.
Louis (USA), first of all because I am a history-lover, and second, because I
am researching for several years already, in order to write a novel whose plot
takes place during WWII, but the archives I am interested in were bombed and
burned. However, the evil was equally dark and every piece of documentation
helps in recreating the setting and the atmosphere of a historical novel, but
not necessarily a documentary as the archives were bombed.
Generally
speaking, this approx. 1-hour virtual tour is for me the ideal tour, because
first, the virtual visitor can make a few clicks and have a general look at
what the museum exhibits (please click here). Then, the virtual guest is
welcomed by two hosts – one of them being the granddaughter of two survivors
giving a more personal dimension to the visit. Finally, each of the two guests
take turns in explaining piece by piece what the virtual visitor has seen by
itself at the beginning (please click here). Their presentations are
structured by themes under the motto: Where
one burns books, one will, in the end, burn people. It is more than a
motto, rather a demonstrated hypothesis of this virtual tour.
When I posted on this blog the essay
‘When the Holocaust is not a Rock Star…’ in June 2019 (the article continues here), I was outraged by
the results of a public opinion poll showing a high number of people who never
heard of this genocide, or who heard of it, but that they do not believe that
it truly happened. And my point was that this poll results were as they were
because the Holocaust is not a rock star, otherwise most probably everybody
would know about it and believe all the mass media gossips, manufactured
legends and all fake news as being very real. However, all the genocides people
learn about happened in the 20th century – meaning the century of
the photography, the video recording and of that television. The Fuehrer is on
the photo, on camera, on TV – he exited, no denial. Many naked bodies, working
starved to death are on photo, on camera and on TV – they did not existed. What
is that I do not understand?! Is this because some human minds refuse to
believe that people can do such a thing to people? And if some of us refuse to
believe, it solves the problem? The fact that the human mind may refuse to
believe that such manmade atrocities are possible is not even a plausible
assumption, because people have been killing animals hunting and people have
been going to war against other people for millennia. It is hard to understand…
. (to be continued)
No comments:
Post a Comment